YeagerUSMC

Hmm, id have to say black hawk down is my favorite. whoever said Pearl Harbor... wha.. why.. huh? thats not even a war movie, its a gawdamn romance with a 20 min action seen in the middle. w.. t.. f..

hey, some of ya seem to know a good bit bout anime. a friend of mine got me watching naruto a few weeks ago (before that i didnt watch anime), but now ive finished everything thats out so far (anime and manga). can someone suggest another series thats pretty good?

because bungie spends time on there storyline, as well as supporting their fanbase.

Disney seems to be trying to cut a bad investment. Moore's film is to politicaly high strung for what the company aims to make its films. Its a perfectly sound move on the economic side. A political film would polarize disney customers, and while some, even most if youd like, would agree with the films message, it still loses followers who had supported it when it was nuetral because they may disagree strongly with the film.

Mind if i jump in and post some pics aswell? i also love to draw, though i do tend to sketch in pencil. Your work is pretty nice, i liked the washed marker effect. Heres a kinda assasin type i did

Halo. Definitely Halo. Good AI, good graphics, good storyline, co-op option, solid multiplayer, vehicles, and above all, damn fun. Whoever said its a run and gun, id like you to try that on legendary. only downsides were the repetitive level design and the small collection of weapons (not the fact you could only carry two, that added to strategy, but rather than there were only 8 guns in the game)

haha, you've just watched the ring: computer version. in 7 days, a midget b*tch will walk out of you C&C game and turn off your monitor, causing you to loose vs an easy computer AI and thus eternal humiliation.

man, its a shame ya cant get a paintball marker. i go paintballing prob once a month or so. for airsoft? hmm, like the guy said, try your friends guns before you buy anything. i also like the .20, but again, try it out and see what ya like.

yeah, the whole areas got its problems. im not sure i like us considering saudi arabia as an "ally". maybe its time to close the topic? i think any further statement cant do much good. weve each got our own opinion and our own reasons and justifications. i probaly shouldnt have replied the second time, oh well. ciao.

QUOTE now let the USAF flyboys finish the job where theres no danger of being shot, hung, and burned by some terrorist ****. unfortunately, that would get civilians killed and be political suicide. airplanes are for shock and awe, not for search and destroy. - not in cities, c'mon now, do you think im that stupid? Let the flyboys do what theyve been doing the whole time, bomb them in theyr holes. just take the "sitting targets" of the ground and let the USAF keep doin its job. If it needs to be done in a city, use a low yield smart bomb or if necesary insert a sniper. QUOTE (YeagerUSMC @ Apr 14 2004, 8:12 PM) but theres still a 50/50 chance... Wrong. There isnt a 50/50 chance, there can be a 50/50 chance. Lets reckon it, none of us knows the truth to state empirical facts. - ok, ill refrase that. the is a chance, whatever its percentage, and not a negligable one given the size and detectability of such a weapon. It is dificult for me, im not saying anyone else, just giving my reason, to leave such a threat, on top of the factors i mentioned in my first post, unanswered. edit: sorry bout the spellin. eh.

A completely different can off worms, but theres still a 50/50 chance that WMDs are in iraq at this moment, or were brought across the border during our invasion by a "refugee". For those of you who dont know, the manufacture and storage of a biological weapon with city-killing potential requiers an object approximately the size of your home microwave. What would be the reaction if Boston, or LA, or any other US city, became a ghost town? Im sure others have a diferent opinion, but i could not in good conscience have left Saddam in power when the consequences are so devestating. and the use in his hands so probable. However, we've suffered far to many casualties in the process. We're sitting targets on the ground. Humvees and small convoys are bullet magnets. We've done what we came for, now let the USAF flyboys finish the job where theres no danger of being shot, hung, and burned by some terrorist ****. Let the iraqis have iraq. give reconstruction contracts to iraqi companies, not US ones. its more efective at jumpstarting their economy, aside from looking alot better for the world than giving ourself money. Let them elect their president, and once the situation has stabilized, leave em be. what are they going to do, bomb themselves to stop themselves from being rebuilt?

For the war, but not strongly. Saddam was a threat. Aside from causing mass starvation in his own country, hes invaded another, gassed his own people (or if you dont consider the kurds his, gassed another people in something near genocide), lobbed missiles at a sovereign nation when not at war, and funded terrorists (10k to suicide bomber families, if you dont believe the alqueda/hamas ties). Im in favor of the war, but we shouldnt expect much gratitude from the iraqi's. Hatered of the West has been fairly well ingrained into middle eastern countries, except israel. Hell, they learn it in school. I think that now that we've eliminated the threat, while we cant pull out, we can back off. Take or soldiers off the ground, dont give the terrorist ****ers easy targets. keep a CAP over strategic areas, and use smart bombs on identified targets. turn the country back over to the iraqis as fast as possible, and give them time to see what a change for the better they have because of what we did, without us being there as a target for their hatered.

wew, no more buggyness. I was haveing that same problem, was getting annoying. i can cut and paste now, heh

well, ive got a cat, but a covie grunt would be cool...

heh, halo and SW?