DerelictStudios Forums: P-38 As First Fighter - DerelictStudios Forums

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

P-38 As First Fighter maybe its not a good idea

#1 User is offline   Zero() 

  • 1st Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 240
  • Joined: 05-June 04

Posted 23 June 2004 - 03:20 AM

first off, the p38 was used in the pacific, this is seeming to be a european mod, second, the p38 wasnt just a cheap fighter, and it enterd the war much later.
i think that they should get p40s or a earlier weaker version of the p47d
0

#2 User is offline   Stuka_Geschwader 

  • Private
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 21-June 04

Posted 23 June 2004 - 03:51 AM

Ummm the P-38 was used quite a bit in Europe, considering it was an Army fighter and not a Naval one. Well I agree with you that it should be replaced with the P-47d but it didn't really come in at late war. The U.S. used them throughout their campaign from beggining to end in both Pacific and European, though they did use it more in Europe.
0

#3 User is offline   maskawaih 

  • say what
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 4,251
  • Joined: 02-June 04
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 23 June 2004 - 03:55 AM

well, i wanted to see vought Corsair if naval is implemented in blitz2. :P
0

#4 User is offline   Stuka_Geschwader 

  • Private
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 21-June 04

Posted 23 June 2004 - 03:58 AM

I'm sure they will seeing as how it was the P-51 of the Pacific, in terms of fame and it was a good aircraft.
0

#5 User is offline   maskawaih 

  • say what
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 4,251
  • Joined: 02-June 04
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 23 June 2004 - 04:01 AM

yeah but corsair was the navy planes. anyway, which was the US navy airforce's torpedo bomber?

This post has been edited by maskawaih: 23 June 2004 - 04:01 AM

0

#6 User is offline   Stuka_Geschwader 

  • Private
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 21-June 04

Posted 23 June 2004 - 04:09 AM

The TB-1 Avenger
0

#7 User is offline   Smurf Bizkit 

  • 1st General
  • Group: Volcano Officer
  • Posts: 9,044
  • Joined: 04-April 03
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 23 June 2004 - 05:37 AM

We design the mod from a gameplay perspective. The P-38 was added so that people who go for the nuke have some sort of fighter/ ground attack plane.
0

#8 User is offline   Zero() 

  • 1st Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 240
  • Joined: 05-June 04

Posted 23 June 2004 - 05:38 AM

i would like to see the me109, b25, a heavy airfield, light artillery, stationary artillery, halftrack transports both allies and axis, winterized units(skis on inf, camo, etc.), and i think that planes like the mossy should have a secondary weapon, like the bazooka men, the mossy was also a fighter. smurf, give them the hurricane, it can be given cannons that would be used as a fighter and a ground attack.

This post has been edited by Zero(): 23 June 2004 - 05:42 AM

0

#9 User is offline   maskawaih 

  • say what
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 4,251
  • Joined: 02-June 04
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 23 June 2004 - 05:47 AM

easy to say but hard to do.
0

#10 User is offline   Freedom 

  • Major General
  • Group: Volcano Soldier
  • Posts: 3,905
  • Joined: 02-April 04
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 23 June 2004 - 02:33 PM

And even harder to decifer. ^_^ Please use proper punctuation, which isn't ten commas and one period. ;)
0

#11 User is offline   Eisenhower 

  • Brigadier General
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 2,261
  • Joined: 02-April 04

Posted 23 June 2004 - 03:11 PM

Most of your suggestions simply make overlaps within the game. From a gameplay perspective, there should only be units we really need.
0

#12 User is offline   CorathSS 

  • 2nd Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 160
  • Joined: 08-May 04

Posted 23 June 2004 - 09:01 PM

He's right about the hurricane though, and same with the Half Tracks..

German half tracks mounted MG42s, and carried men, and pulled some arty, don't see why we can't get them early game.. be able to hold its own against early game units, and get the men in, and get out... think a BA10, but upgraded :lol: with a larger troop capacity.

And I think he means BF 109?? Which was more common in the war, and Aces preferred it over the FW, a later design allowed more agility and speed, at the expense of fire power.

Why B25? Just give us a B17 we can control, I'd imagine we'd all whore it into a functional Anti fighter weapon :P It only had over a dozen .50 cals mounted on it.
0

#13 User is offline   BoB 

  • Brigadier General
  • Group: Volcano Soldier
  • Posts: 2,697
  • Joined: 14-April 03
  • Location:UK
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 23 June 2004 - 10:47 PM

It was the Me109, "Bf" designated the factory it was built in :P

I do like the idea of the Hurricane for the brits though, esp if it could be INDIVIDUALLY upgraded (like the Pz4 in v026) with AT cannons, as used in N.Africa. That would be a very adaptable and handy addition/repleacement to their armoury, and the Brits were renound for their tweaking fo planes and editions like this, as shown by the 13 (i think off the top of my head) marks of Spitfire. Basically, i like them :lol:
0

#14 User is offline   Korona 

  • Von Braun
  • Group: Volcano Lord
  • Posts: 6,478
  • Joined: 01-September 03
  • Location:England
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 23 June 2004 - 11:06 PM

I think it would overlap with the Thunderbolt/Il2 too much as a ground attack fighter. I prefer the speedy Mosquito, it's more unique.
0

#15 User is offline   Private Reiben 

  • 2nd Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 101
  • Joined: 09-June 04

Posted 24 June 2004 - 01:21 AM

Mosquito, IL2, they all fall before the might of the Go229!
0

#16 User is offline   maskawaih 

  • say what
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 4,251
  • Joined: 02-June 04
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 24 June 2004 - 02:21 AM

BoB, on Jun 24 2004, 4:47 AM, said:

It was the Me109, "Bf" designated the factory it was built in :lol:...

yeah, Bayerische Flugzeugwerk is the factory. but then later in war, the factory was under Messerschmidt
0

#17 User is offline   CorathSS 

  • 2nd Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 160
  • Joined: 08-May 04

Posted 24 June 2004 - 03:48 AM

Oh, well I just say BF 109, as history tends to call it :(

The Hurricane was a multi purpose fighter, and actually was showing its age, sorta like the 110, though, German planes were notorious about getting the leg up, speed wise, on allied variants :lol:
0

#18 User is offline   maskawaih 

  • say what
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 4,251
  • Joined: 02-June 04
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 24 June 2004 - 03:59 AM

because hurricane was the main raf fighter before spitfire.

BTW, why bf109 and bf110 is so different? just like ju-87 and ju-88. :(
0

#19 User is offline   CorathSS 

  • 2nd Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 160
  • Joined: 08-May 04

Posted 24 June 2004 - 04:02 AM

BTW, I remember some one mentioning the whole 30mm bomber thing..it was Shrage Musik installation, used 20mms, aimed up and backwards...so not 30mm.. I knew that was bugging me for some reason.
0

#20 User is offline   maskawaih 

  • say what
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 4,251
  • Joined: 02-June 04
  • Location:Malaysia
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 24 June 2004 - 04:06 AM

nah.. i just thinking. the size is different... look at ju-88 and ju-87. totally different size. somewhat equal purpose. but sure ju-87 can be a fighter. :(
0

Share this topic:


  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users