DerelictStudios Forums: North Korean Air Force - DerelictStudios Forums

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

North Korean Air Force Your 2 Cents on NKAF

Poll: Which Airplane would u prefer for NKs Air Superiority fighter? (42 member(s) have cast votes)

Which Airplane would u prefer for NKs Air Superiority fighter?

  1. SU-27 (12 votes [28.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.57%

  2. SU-30MKK (4 votes [9.52%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.52%

  3. Mig 1.44 (14 votes [33.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.33%

  4. Other (Specify Below) (12 votes [28.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.57%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   USAF05 

  • 2nd Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 198
  • Joined: 16-April 05
  • Location:NM

Posted 12 May 2005 - 05:30 PM

dry.gif Mario....Dude, i guess you dont know or forgot, but Iraq is stricktly on Iraqi/Sino technology. The Iraqs dont really use the Russians directly, only through China. N Korea is actually more suited to be using Russian Tech cause theyre right on their border and the trade lines are pretty easy to navigate.
0

#22 User is offline   XMarioX 

  • Sergeant Major
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: 28-April 05
  • Location:Kessler AFB, Mississippi

Posted 12 May 2005 - 08:05 PM

meh mis read, not like the soviets and chinese didnt use the same companies, just had diffrent prefrences rolleyes.gif
0

#23 User is offline   Dag 

  • Major
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 781
  • Joined: 26-February 05
  • Location:Florida

Posted 12 May 2005 - 10:15 PM

QUOTE(EvilViking @ May 12 2005, 4:24 AM)
They were once the 4th largest army in the world (just before Gulf War 1).

Not to bash you, but Germany had the Largest army in 1939. tongue.gif
0

#24 User is offline   Kaiser_Smeghead 

  • Boo-Boo Bear
  • Group: Volcano Knight
  • Posts: 1,586
  • Joined: 14-August 04
  • Location:Brandon, Manitoba, Canada
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 13 May 2005 - 06:28 AM

And it actually got them pretty far before they were finally defeated. (after 6 years and over 50 million dead on all sides that is)
0

#25 User is offline   USAF05 

  • 2nd Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 198
  • Joined: 16-April 05
  • Location:NM

Posted 13 May 2005 - 04:38 PM

lol
0

#26 User is offline   USAF05 

  • 2nd Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 198
  • Joined: 16-April 05
  • Location:NM

Posted 17 May 2005 - 10:35 PM

Anyways the Mig 1.44 would be good if people wanted it that bad. But personally i think if i could id change my vote to the Su-27 cause they buy stuff off the Russians and the Russians are getting rid of there Su-27s for the new and improved Su-37 Super Flanker. Iraq should have Mig 29s Its not fare that they get superflankers. Its just not suited to them.
0

#27 User is offline   Kaiser_Smeghead 

  • Boo-Boo Bear
  • Group: Volcano Knight
  • Posts: 1,586
  • Joined: 14-August 04
  • Location:Brandon, Manitoba, Canada
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 19 May 2005 - 12:37 AM

How about MiG-31's for NK? That could be a possibility, it would give the NKAF a nice air to air fighting ability.

And i still support Su-37's for Iraq's airforces. It seems correct to fit in with Iraq's new superpower status. I just hope the Iraqi's get at least one more airplane to go with it.
0

#28 User is offline   USAF05 

  • 2nd Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 198
  • Joined: 16-April 05
  • Location:NM

Posted 19 May 2005 - 10:21 PM

Hmmm. I like the idea of 31s. But i still think they should have 29s. Theyre more accustomed to have multirole ability than the foxbat.
0

#29 User is offline   Eyeflash 

  • Private
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 01-June 05

Posted 01 June 2005 - 04:49 PM

Sorry for upping this, but if the plan for the DPRK(North Korea that is) is to have another country(say the USA) invade, thus making it a campaign for national liberation like China's in Generals vanilla, you might want to have a look at the tactics that could be used by the DPRK in war:

http://www.rense.com/general37/nkorr.htm
0

#30 User is offline   Delta Force 

  • 1st Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 290
  • Joined: 06-February 05

Posted 06 June 2005 - 04:59 PM

You could use some ideas from mercirces. How about this plane idea: a old MiG with a kamakaizie piolit since its suacidal to fly anything that crappy anyways.
0

#31 User is offline   Lestat87 

  • Private
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 09-August 05

Posted 10 August 2005 - 06:59 AM

Su-27 all the way

not only does it look really cool but its a great fighter
i mean its capable of doing the cobra manover

for thoes that dunno what that is it's kinda like a wheeley in an aircraft because of the high pitched nose it pulls up and uses air brakes to kick the tail forward really cool when it's done in a dog fight
0

#32 User is offline   killakanz 

  • Man with a heart, a soul. And a gun.
  • Group: Volcano Lord
  • Posts: 4,633
  • Joined: 12-November 03
  • Location:Hampshire, UK
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 16 August 2005 - 11:28 AM

if you guys fancy them I got models of the Migs 29 and 31 you could use smile.gif
0

#33 User is offline   Leonardofury 

  • Colonel
  • Group: Volcano Soldier
  • Posts: 1,510
  • Joined: 27-November 03
  • Location:Somerset, UK

Posted 16 August 2005 - 01:45 PM

Mig 29
0

#34 User is offline   Garrick 

  • HentaiFanBoy
  • Group: Volcano Soldier
  • Posts: 731
  • Joined: 12-November 03
  • Location:Torino

Posted 16 August 2005 - 03:41 PM

we were mainly going for the Mig 29 and the Mi-35 and only that, because the USA Faction is the airforce oriented one, but keep the ideas flowing!
0

#35 User is offline   Paladin327 

  • 1st Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: 27-June 04

Posted 16 August 2005 - 04:54 PM

QUOTE
Not to bash you, but Germany had the Largest army in 1939. 
do you seriously know how irrelevant that is?

This post has been edited by Paladin327: 16 August 2005 - 04:57 PM

0

#36 User is offline   Jackseno 

  • Captain
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 477
  • Joined: 08-May 05

Posted 16 August 2005 - 05:48 PM

concordantly.................. i think the migs preety kl, but there was something about the wings which ment it barreld quick or something.... sequentially i dont even think concordantly is a word........
0

#37 User is offline   USAF05 

  • 2nd Lieutenant
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 198
  • Joined: 16-April 05
  • Location:NM

Posted 17 August 2005 - 07:24 AM

wink.gif well it doesnt matter if it is or isnt a word. Besides i think that a MiG-29 is a good idea, but the Su-34 would be a cool one to have.
0

#38 User is offline   Jackseno 

  • Captain
  • Group: Volcano Citizen
  • Posts: 477
  • Joined: 08-May 05

Posted 17 August 2005 - 10:43 AM

Diferent Generals Diferent supiriority fighters, simple, one guy who has all the nukes has one, and the other who has the.....air....craft....or whatever can have the other....
0

#39 User is offline   IconOfEvi 

  • Vulcano Telegraph Reporter / Random Task-Man
  • Group: Volcano Knight
  • Posts: 9,874
  • Joined: 04-November 03
  • Location:Racine, Wisconsin, USA
  • Mod Registrations:

Posted 18 August 2005 - 06:30 PM

You guys are sorta ignoring an important concept - Russia doesn't sell to North Korea...they don't like each other.

But Su-27s wouldn't be too hard to come by...those and Mig-29s. They would need their own homebrew, slightly more or less crappy, since they have to make spares, right? Possibly Foxbats too, as they were there since 1980s...Tu-95s would be there, defenitley not Tu-160...but maybe the Tu-22M...? NK DEFENITLEY wouldn't have anything above Su-27...Su-30s are cream de la cream, and NK wouldn't have em.

And as for Hinds...the most they would have is the Hind-D...
happy.gif
0

#40 User is offline   EvilViking 

  • stargazer
  • Group: Volcano Officer
  • Posts: 3,413
  • Joined: 10-April 04
  • Location:Virginia, USA

Posted 18 August 2005 - 07:06 PM

But then, this is alternate reality. tongue.gif
0

Share this topic:


  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users